Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives

Titre :	ion, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives
Auteur(s) :	Hélène Landemore
Résumé Court :	Papier académique (H. Landemore, Department of Political Science, Yale University) qui argumente sérieusement pour le tirage au sort. Beaucoup de références qui semblent pertinentes. Réponds aux objections classique (compétences, ...). Abstract This paper argues in favor of the epistemic properties of inclusiveness in the context of democratic deliberative assemblies and derives the implications of this argument in terms of the epistemically superior mode of selection of representatives. The paper makes the general case that, all other things being equal and under some reasonable assumptions, more is smarter. When applied to deliberative assemblies of representatives, where there is an upper limit to the number of people that can be included in the group, the argument translates into a defense of a speciﬁc selection mode of participants: random selection.
Difficulté (de lecture) :	En anglais, un peu technique mais plutôt clair.
Pages liées :	Spécial:Pages_liées/Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives