Voir la source de Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives

{{Document
|AUTEURS=Hélène Landemore
|Resume=Papier académique (H. Landemore, Department of Political Science, Yale University) qui argumente sérieusement pour le tirage au sort. Beaucoup de références qui semblent pertinentes. Réponds aux objections classique (compétences, ...).

Abstract

This paper argues in favor of the epistemic properties of inclusiveness in 
the context of democratic deliberative assemblies and derives the implications of this 
argument in terms of the epistemically superior mode of selection of representatives. 
The paper makes the general case that, all other things being equal and under some 
reasonable assumptions, more is smarter. When applied to deliberative assemblies of 
representatives, where there is an upper limit to the number of people that can be 
included in the group, the argument translates into a defense of a speciﬁc selection 
mode of participants: random selection.
|Difficulte=En anglais, un peu technique mais plutôt clair.
}}
http://philpapers.org/rec/LANDCD

PDF: http://d.pr/f/Zvpl