The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies
Discussion externe au wiki sur cet article - Discussions internes au wiki sur cet article
|titre||The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies|
|resume|| "The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies", by Wiebe E Bijker, Roland Bal, and Ruud Hendriks, reveals the political decision-making in a study of the inner workings of the “Gezondheidsraad,” a scientific advisory body to the Dutch government.
the debates should not be watched in real time but we should also bear in mind that if the idea of “discussions in private” were interpreted too narrowly, then we would not have had this study or this book to reassure us that things were going along OK. “Private” debates should be monitored by representatives of the public from time-to-time even if everyone agrees that what was said cannot be made fully public until after some delay.
(vu sur https://twitter.com/t_landrain/status/354628513686499328 )
Video de wikipediafr:Pierre-Henri Gouyon sur les questions de politique scientifique :